Why the world’s largest landowners are not who you expect

Ask people who owns the most land and they will name the wrong person: a Saudi royal, Jeff Bezos, Roman Abramovich or whoever has since replaced him as the public face of ostentatious ownership. The answer feels intuitive because it comes from a sensible mental model: extreme wealth concentrates in the hands of visible individuals, and land, being the most tangible of assets, would naturally be among the things those individuals own.

The answer is wrong, and the way it is wrong shows how economic power keeps itself out of view. The world’s largest landowners are not on any wealth ranking. Most of them never appear in any single, consolidated tally of land, and they do not appear in the annual surveys of billionaires that populate the financial press. They are an ancient Church whose property cannot be tallied because it is held across thousands of legal entities that predate modern accounting; a constitutional abstraction that belongs to no individual and answers to no shareholder; agricultural dynasties in Brazil whose planted fields cover more ground than entire European nations; and pension funds managing the retirement savings of schoolteachers who would never describe themselves as landlords.

The Institution That Files No Return

The Catholic Church is estimated to hold around 71 million hectares of land globally. The qualification matters: the figure does not derive from any primary accounting source, because no such source exists. The Church holds property through thousands of separate legal entities, among them dioceses, religious orders, pontifical universities, charitable foundations and national churches in almost every country on earth, and their balance sheets are never consolidated into one set of accounts. The Vatican set up a Secretariat for the Economy in 2014, under Cardinal George Pell, as part of an effort at financial transparency. Yet only in 2021 did the office that manages the Holy See’s own property, the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See (APSA), publish its accounts for the first time: some 4,000 properties in Italy and about 1,100 abroad, not counting its embassies. That list covers a small fraction of Catholic property worldwide. The canonical concept of the “public juridic person”, the legal form through which most Church property is held, was not designed with transparency in mind.

The Juridic Person Problem

Under canon law, a "public juridic person" is an entity, such as a diocese, a religious institute or a pontifical foundation, that acts in the name of the Church and holds property on its behalf. The Secretariat for the Economy has attempted to bring consolidated oversight to this system, and the effort has been instructive for what it revealed. The London property scandal that broke in 2019 centred on 60 Sloane Avenue, a former Harrods warehouse in Chelsea, into which the Vatican's Secretariat of State began investing in 2014 through investment funds and offshore vehicles. The money came from funds the Secretariat of State managed, a pool that also held Peter's Pence, the papal charity collection. The Holy See says the losses were absorbed by the Secretariat of State's own reserves without touching Peter's Pence, and it sold the building in 2022 for £186 million.

In December 2023 a Vatican court convicted Cardinal Angelo Becciu, who has always denied wrongdoing, and several co-defendants. In March 2026 the Vatican Court of Appeal found procedural flaws in the first trial, chiefly an incompletely filed investigation file, and ordered parts of the proceedings to be reheard on appeal, while the first judgment keeps its legal effects. Whatever the final verdict, the case exposed a legal architecture that is inherently opaque. Property held through thousands of juridic persons in dozens of legal systems, accumulating for centuries before modern accounting existed, resists disclosure and, harder still, aggregation. The question of what the Church "owns" cannot be answered, because it assumes a unit of ownership that does not exist.

The holdings include churches and convents, and also agricultural land (extensive in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa), forest reserves, urban real estate, hospitals, universities, and colonial-era grazing land accumulated through donation, evangelisation and land grants from governments that have long since ceased to exist. The diversity of asset types is itself part of the explanation for why no register is maintained: there is no obvious ledger on which to record them all.

The Church’s land was accumulated over centuries, which means that most of it carries no acquisition cost in the present. It generates returns (rent, lease income, development gain) with no corresponding liability to shareholders and, in many jurisdictions, with tax treatment that reflects the institution’s religious rather than commercial character. A landowner with little acquisition cost, limited tax exposure and no obligation to report to anyone outside the Church is a landlord only by a stretch of the word. The Church’s land comes close to being a different category of asset, and the frameworks we use to track concentrated wealth, from wealth rankings to shareholder registers and corporate filings, were not designed to see it. The more revealing fact is that nobody can currently establish the acreage: the way the land is held leaves it unverifiable, whatever the quality of the data.

The Crown That Is Not the King

The Crown Estate holds about 83,000 hectares of rural land (mainly tenanted farmland and uplands, plus the Windsor Estate), around half the foreshore of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the seabed out to twelve nautical miles around those three nations. Beyond that limit, the Energy Act 2004 vests in the Crown the right to generate power from wind and water across the UK’s Renewable Energy Zone, of which the Crown Estate manages the part outside Scottish waters. All told, the Crown Estate puts its seabed at some 268,000 square kilometres. In its 2025/26 annual report it valued its property portfolio at £14.5 billion, with net assets of £16.7 billion.

None of this belongs to the King. The Crown Estate belongs to “the Crown”, a constitutional abstraction that precedes and survives any individual monarch. The sovereign cannot sell it, does not pocket its profits (they go to the Treasury, which uses them as the reference point for setting the Sovereign Grant that funds the monarch’s official duties), and is not legally liable for its management.

The estate is run by the Crown Estate Commissioners, appointed by Royal Warrant, who form an independent board that is legally accountable to Parliament but not directed by it; statisticians class it as a public corporation, yet it is required to operate as a commercial business. It is too permanent and constitutionally embedded to be private property, and too insulated from ministerial direction to be an arm of the state; the Crown Estate itself describes its position as between the public and private sectors.

Seabed and the Clean Energy Dividend

The Crown Estate's offshore holdings acquired a new economic significance in the 2020s as offshore wind became central to UK energy policy. Because the Crown Estate owns the seabed, it owns the platform on which offshore wind turbines are built, and it collects lease income from wind farm operators. The Crown Estate Act 2025, which received Royal Assent in March 2025, gave the Crown Estate borrowing powers for the first time and widened what it may invest in. The government announced the expansion in the King's Speech of July 2024 and justified it chiefly by the need to speed up offshore wind.

Crown Estate property in Scotland is a separate matter: it has been managed since 2017 by Crown Estate Scotland, under the Scotland Act 2016 and the Scottish Crown Estate Act 2019. The Act leaves open the question the Church case raised: who benefits. The seabed beneath Britain's offshore wind installations belongs to the Crown, and its lease income passes to the Treasury (£487 million in 2025/26) before dissolving into general public spending.

Even the Windsor Estate, some 6,400 hectares of forest, lakes, gardens and parkland around Windsor Castle, including Windsor Great Park, belongs to the Crown Estate, not to the King. The monarch’s own landholdings are a separate and much smaller matter: the Duchy of Lancaster, a private estate held in trust for the sovereign, covers about 17,000 hectares of rural land, alongside private residences such as Sandringham and Balmoral.

What the Crown Estate shares with the Church’s dispersed holdings is the outcome: an enormous concentration of land that is not legible as private wealth, does not appear on wealth rankings, and is rarely challenged through the mechanisms available to voters or markets. When Parliament last rewrote the Crown Estate’s powers, in 2025, it expanded them. The Church disperses its land across thousands of juridic persons; the Crown Estate consolidates its own within a constitutional abstraction.

The Interior Empires

SLC Agrícola, controlled by the Logemann family and traded on the São Paulo stock exchange, has budgeted about 854,000 hectares of planted area for the 2026/27 season. Planted area is not the same as land owned: it counts second crops grown on the same fields within a season, and much of it is leased or farmed in partnership with investment funds. In 2023 SLC owned roughly a third of the land it planted. Even so, the planted area alone is larger than the land area of Delaware. The Logemann family built this on the Brazilian agricultural frontier, through an expansion into the Cerrado savanna that began with government subsidy, continued through land clearing, and was formalised into the kind of holdings that appear in investor presentations.

The Bom Futuro Group, founded in the early 1980s by Eraí Maggi Scheffer, his brothers Elusmar and Fernando and their brother-in-law José Maria Bortoli, plants about 650,000 hectares of soy, corn and cotton a year, almost all of it in Mato Grosso. Blairo Maggi (the billionaire former governor of Mato Grosso and federal agriculture minister nicknamed the “Soy King”) is Eraí’s cousin, and his branch of the family controls the separately constituted Amaggi Group; the two operations represent different branches of the same extended family and different chapters of the same regional story. Other farming families repeat the pattern on a smaller scale: the Vigolo family’s Bom Jesus group, based in Rondonópolis, was farming about 250,000 hectares when it sought bankruptcy protection in 2016.

The Cerrado's Invisible Crisis

The Brazilian Cerrado, the tropical savanna that covers almost a quarter of Brazil, is the world's most biodiverse savanna and reaches into eight of Brazil's twelve hydrographic regions. It has received a fraction of the conservation attention directed at the Amazon, even though about half of it has already been turned over to farms, pasture and other human uses; 40 million hectares of native vegetation were lost between 1985 and 2024 alone. The agribusiness expansion into the Cerrado had government help. Credit programmes, including PRODECER, the Japanese-Brazilian cooperation programme for Cerrado development launched in 1979, subsidised the conversion of savanna into soy and corn farmland. PRODECER alone developed about 345,000 hectares, and these programmes helped open the region to the industrial-scale farming on which the dynastic holdings were built. The land being accumulated into these empires was already occupied: ecologically, by one of the planet's richest biomes, and culturally, by quilombola communities, indigenous groups and smallholder farmers whose displacement is part of the same history that produced the 650,000-hectare portfolios.

These dynasties are legible in a way the Church and the Crown Estate are not. The Logemann family’s holdings are reported in investor materials, and SLC Agrícola’s financials are public. That legibility has produced no serious political challenge to the concentration, but it sharpens the contrast with what follows. The Brazilian families are visible landowners, holding land through identifiable family-controlled companies and, in SLC’s case, publishing audited accounts on a stock exchange. Anyone who wants to know who owns these farms in the Cerrado can find out. Their new neighbours are harder to trace: fund vehicles, registered in jurisdictions that give no indication of who ultimately holds the asset.

The Fund That Owns Your Pension’s Farm

Nuveen Natural Capital is the land-investment platform of Nuveen, the asset manager in the TIAA group (TIAA being the pension provider for US university staff, teachers and academic workers), and it ranks as the world’s largest manager of farmland and timberland assets by value. At the end of 2025 it managed $12.1 billion of farmland across more than 2 million gross acres. Macquarie Asset Management, the investment arm of the Australian financial group, reports about 4.6 million hectares of farmland and A$5.3 billion of agricultural assets under management as of March 2026: a far larger area, but a smaller portfolio by value.

Bill Gates, the most visible individual farmland owner in the United States, holds about 275,000 acres through his Cascade Investment vehicle, most of it farmland spread across 17 states. He is dwarfed by Nuveen’s fund vehicles, and he is legible in a way that Nuveen’s holdings are not: Gates’s acreage is publicly ranked and reported. Nuveen does publish a headline figure, more than 2 million gross acres of farmland, and an interactive map of its farms. But the map gives farmed area rather than registered boundaries and, when it was checked against Brazil’s land registry in 2020, did not fully match the land registries, so the full picture of which vehicles hold which land has to be pieced together from land registries, fund documents and field investigations.

The institutional farmland owners themselves (Nuveen, Macquarie, Farmland Partners and Gladstone Land Corporation) are less recognisable names than the billionaires with ranches and timberland at the top of the Land Report’s list of American landowners, and the biggest of them operate at a scale that list does not register: Macquarie’s farmland alone covers about four times the acreage of Stan Kroenke, who leads it with 2.7 million acres.

The Post-2008 Asset Class

Farmland moved from a niche to a mainstream institutional asset class through a specific sequence of events. The 2008 financial crisis destroyed confidence in financial instruments whose risks had been obscured by complexity. Commodity prices spiked, making food-producing land visibly valuable, and the 2007–2008 food price crisis acted as a catalyst: when food prices spike, the asset underlying the food supply becomes a more attractive investment. Meanwhile an investment rationale began circulating among pension fund managers, and TIAA-CREF articulated it publicly in 2012 when it announced $2 billion in commitments to its Global Agriculture LLC vehicle: farmland, the argument went, offers a hedge against inflation and low correlation with equity markets. By 2023 there were 960 active funds specialised in food and agricultural assets, managing more than $150 billion. Farmland prices had nearly doubled worldwide between 2008 and 2022, and tripled in Central and Eastern Europe. Institutional capital was directed to farmland by crisis and by a body of investment theory arguing, correctly, that land is the one input into food production that cannot be manufactured.

The funds also differ from the dynasties in character. The owner of a dynastic fazenda, or farm estate, has an interest in the long-term productivity of the specific land he holds, whatever the circumstances of the original land acquisition. Much of his land cost his grandfather’s generation no more than the price of clearing it, and his horizon is indefinite; the land will pass to his heirs. An investment fund holds land as an asset with a target return, a defined investment horizon and an obligation to its limited partners, and a position held to be sold is managed differently from a place held to be passed on. That shows in how the land is managed, in what tenants can expect and in what happens to local communities when the fund’s target return is met and the portfolio is rotated.

In one Australian agricultural region, New England North West in New South Wales, financialised agri-corporate investors acquired almost 200,000 hectares of farmland between 2004 and 2019 through three roughly equal pathways: takeovers of listed or unlisted agricultural companies, purchase of farms already packaged as financial assets, and aggregation of family farms. The geographers who followed them call the way financial capital amasses land and restructures regional agricultures “flexible and opportunistic”. IPES-Food argues that the incentive model of financial land ownership produces outcomes systematically different from those of conventional agricultural operations: pressure toward short-term extraction, reduced investment in soil health, constraint on local supply chains and indifference to existing operators.

TIAA was founded with Andrew Carnegie’s backing in 1918 to provide pensions for college teachers, and it still manages the retirement savings of American academics and teachers. Millions of people who have spent careers thinking about inequality and the structure of economic power are invested, through their pension accounts, in farmland portfolios that Chain Reaction Research linked in 2020 to fires, land conflicts and legacy deforestation risks in Brazil. The group identified nearly 3,000 hectares cleared between 2009 and 2018 on six TIAA portfolio farms in Brazil’s Matopiba region, and 2,350 hectares burned on three farms in August 2019. The beneficial owners, the schoolteachers, are given no say in which farms their retirement accounts finance, no control over the decisions made about those holdings, and little practical means of contesting them.

The pension fund disperses ownership through LP structures and SPVs, limited partnerships and special purpose vehicles whose names give no indication of their ultimate beneficial owner.

The Logic That Makes It Permanent

David Ricardo identified the specific problem with land in 1817, and his analysis still explains why concentrated land behaves differently from other concentrated wealth. Land is fixed in supply. Unlike capital, it cannot be manufactured; unlike labour, it cannot be multiplied. This means that rent, the return to land as a factor of production, is a toll extracted from everyone who needs land and does not own it, rather than a reward for productive activity. When population increases or economic activity intensifies, the demand for land rises. The owners of land capture the resulting rise in rent without having improved the asset. Economists call Ricardo’s mechanism “differential rent”: as population grows and poorer or less conveniently situated land is brought into use, the better land earns a surplus equal to its advantage over the worst land in cultivation, and that surplus flows to its owners. The mechanism requires no particular malice or even intent; it follows from an asset whose supply cannot respond to demand.

The International Land Coalition estimated in 2020 that the largest 1% of farms worldwide operate more than 70% of the world’s farmland. Measured by value, the top 10% of the rural population captures 60% of agricultural land, while the bottom 50% captures only 3%. Value is the more telling figure, since it registers the concentration of the most productive and commercially accessible land within the top tier.

The housing consequence follows from the same mechanism, though the chain of causation is more politically contested. When land near employment centres is held in concentrated portfolios, whether dynastic, institutional or constitutional, the argument runs that supply is constrained because landowners benefit from scarcity rather than because construction is difficult. In February 2024 the UK Competition and Markets Authority, concluding its study of the housebuilding market, tested exactly this argument. It found that the eleven largest housebuilders held about 1.17 million plots in their land banks, but concluded that neither land banking nor the operation of the land market was itself driving poor outcomes; it pointed instead to the planning system and to housebuilders’ incentive to build out slowly enough to protect sale prices. In Britain, at least, the evidence places scarcity upstream of ownership.

The food system argument is more direct and better documented. Financialised land ownership changes the conditions under which food is produced. When land is managed by an investment fund with a defined return target, long-term soil health, local supply chains and smallholder access enter the model only as far as they move the return. Such funds hold farms as financial instruments, whoever does the farming, and that matters for what the land produces, for whom, and on what terms.

The self-reinforcing feature is the one Ricardo identified: because land cannot be created, those who hold it during periods of rising demand capture appreciation without any improvement to the asset, and that capital can be deployed to acquire more land, at prices that smaller buyers cannot meet. Land inequality is rising in most countries, and in Asia alone it has grown by 11% since 1980. The specific acceleration since the 1990s has two distinguishable causes: the liberalisation of agricultural land markets in the Global South under structural adjustment conditions attached to IMF and World Bank lending, which opened markets previously inaccessible to foreign capital; and the post-2008 financialisation of farmland as an asset class, which provided both the institutional capital and the investment case for buying at unprecedented scale and speed.

The Visibility Problem

England and Wales’s Land Registry is among the more transparent land ownership systems in the world, and even there, Guy Shrubsole needed years of work to reconstruct a picture of concentrated ownership from registry data for his 2019 book. Shrubsole found that about 25,000 landowners hold roughly half of England; that the aristocracy and landed gentry retain about 30% of England despite everything the twentieth century did to redistribute it; and that, at the time, the owners of around 17% of England and Wales were undeclared because the land had never been registered, a share the government put at about 11% in November 2025.

In most of the world, the situation is considerably worse. Land ownership data is fragmented across local registries, held in formats resistant to aggregate analysis, maintained with varying degrees of accuracy and completeness, and not required to identify the ultimate beneficial owner of land held through corporate vehicles. A pension fund’s farmland holdings do not appear on any list of landowners. They appear in fund prospectuses, limited partnership filings and land registry entries under vehicle names that give no indication of who ultimately holds the asset. Nuveen’s headline acreage can be looked up, and so can its own map of its farms. But when Chain Reaction Research checked that map against Brazil’s land registry in Matopiba, the registered holdings came out larger than the map showed, and some registered properties were not on the map at all. The full ownership map is reconstructed by researchers and journalists who are specifically looking for it, through legal entity searches, agricultural land register requests and cross-referencing of corporate ownership chains, work that is laborious and incomplete by design.

Each of the ownership forms traced here can keep aggregate landholding from becoming a legible political fact. The Church holds land through thousands of canonical entities that predate modern accounting and resist consolidation; the Crown Estate holds it through a constitutional form that sits between public and private. The Brazilian dynasties hold it in legible family names, but in a legal and political environment where legibility has not produced accountability. The pension funds hold it through LP and SPV structures that are opaque by architectural design. These are four different architectures, built across many centuries: the juridic persons of medieval canon law, the 1760 settlement under which George III surrendered the Crown lands’ revenues to Parliament, the family companies of Brazil’s agricultural frontier and the LP structures of post-2008 asset management.

None of this requires a conspiracy. The Catholic Church did not design canon law in 1983 in order to obscure its land from financial journalists, and the Crown Estate’s constitutional ambiguity is a medieval inheritance. Even so, ownership at a scale that would be politically significant, if it could be seen, cannot be seen, because the category in which it exists falls outside the frameworks designed to make economic power visible.

In each case the invisibility comes with its own political immunity. The Church’s land is rarely a target for redistribution because it is held by a religious institution, and the historical and spiritual legitimacy attached to that institution functions as an immunity. The Crown Estate escapes challenge because it has always existed, and because the alternative, “nationalising” the seabed, sounds more radical than it is in a constitutional arrangement where the seabed has never been private. The Brazilian dynasties face little challenge because their holdings are produced within a system of agricultural capitalism that the country’s political economy depends on and, during commodity booms, celebrates. Nuveen’s farmland is rarely questioned outside NGO reports, because it is held for pensioners, and questioning it appears to threaten teachers’ retirements. That immunity works by positioning the middle-class beneficiary as a hostage of the very concentration they might otherwise object to.

Each of these ownership forms has built its own case for why its land is different, exempt from the normal calculus of concentrated wealth and located in a category where the usual questions do not apply. Any political response to land concentration first requires legibility: the ability to name who holds what and to follow the ownership chain from the registered entity back to the ultimate beneficiary. That prerequisite is absent in almost every jurisdiction in the world, and almost entirely so in the categories where concentration is highest.

Closing

Ricardo understood in 1817 why this matters more for land than for any other asset: with a fixed supply, concentration compounds, and the compounding requires no effort from the owner, only the fact of ownership. The old enclosures were made by Acts of Parliament. The new ones are made through LP structures and offshore vehicles, and the enclosers include teachers’ pension funds.

Gen AI Disclaimer

Some contents of this page were generated and/or edited with the help of a Generative AI.

Media

Yunus Tuğ – Pexels

Key Sources and References

AgFeed. (2024, September 23). No Bom Futuro, aonde a soja vai, o boi vai atrás. https://agfeed.com.br/negocios/no-bom-futuro-aonde-a-soja-vai-o-boi-vai-atras-e-esta-pronto-para-ir-alem

AgFeed. (2026, July 3). Banco AL5 Amaggi troca comando e Sérgio Pizzatto assume como presidente. https://agfeed.com.br/financas/banco-al5-amaggi-troca-comando-e-sergio-pizzatto-assume-como-presidente

Al Jazeera. (2019, December 27). Meet Brazil’s former ‘King of Soy’, now hailed by some conservationists. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2019/12/27/meet-brazils-former-king-of-soy-now-hailed-by-some-conservationists

Bloomberg Línea. (2023). How the Logemann family built SLC Agrícola into a $900M farming empire in Brazil. https://www.bloomberglinea.com/english/how-the-logemann-family-built-slc-agricola-into-a-900m-farming-empire-in-brazil/

Bom Futuro. (2023, December 5). Knowing the history to value it. https://bomfuturo.com.br/en-us/comunicacao/noticias/knowing-the-history-to-value-it

Canberra Times / AAP. (2022, July 2). Vatican closes UK property sale at a loss. https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/7804138/vatican-closes-uk-property-sale-at-a-loss

Chain Reaction Research. (2020, January 23). TIAA’s Farmland Funds Linked to Fires, Conflicts and Legacy Deforestation Risks in Brazil. https://chainreactionresearch.com/report/tiaas-farmland-funds-linked-to-fires-conflicts-and-legacy-deforestation-risks-in-brazil/

9colonne. (2026, March 18). Vatican court orders new trial for Cardinal Becciu over procedural errors. https://www.9colonne.it/600925/vatican-court-orders-new-trial-for-cardinal-becciu-over-procedural-errors

Competition and Markets Authority. (2024, February 26). Housebuilding Market Study: Final Report. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/housebuilding-market-study-final-report/final-report

Duchy of Lancaster. About the Duchy. https://www.duchyoflancaster.co.uk/about-the-duchy/

EWTN News / CNA. (2020, November 2). Vatican bishop: Peter’s Pence not used to cover London investment losses. https://ewtnnews.com/vatican/vatican-bishop-peters-pence-not-used-to-cover-london-investment-losses

EWTN News / CNA. (2022). Can mapping the global Catholic Church help to heal the earth? One scientist aims to find out. https://ewtnnews.com/world/can-mapping-the-global-catholic-church-help-to-heal-the-earth-one-scientist-aims-to-find-out

Farm Progress / Bloomberg. (2016). Brazil soybean producer files for bankruptcy. https://www.farmprogress.com/soybean/brazil-soybean-producer-files-for-bankruptcy

HM Treasury. Sovereign Grant Act 2011: guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sovereign-grant-act-2011-guidance/sovereign-grant-act-2011-guidance

Holy See Press Office. (2026, January 9). Informative note on the diplomatic relations of the Holy See. https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2026/01/09/260109e.html

Instituto Serrapilheira. Cerrado, berço das águas do Brasil. https://serrapilheira.org/en/projetos/cerrado-berco-das-aguas-do-brasil/

International Land Coalition & Oxfam. (2020). Uneven Ground: Land Inequality at the Heart of Unequal Societies. International Land Coalition. https://www.landcoalition.org/en/uneven-ground/

IPES-Food. (2024, May). Land Squeeze: What is driving unprecedented pressures on global farmland and what can be done to achieve equitable access to land?. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems. https://ipes-food.org/report/land-squeeze/

JICA Brazil. PRODECER — Programa de Cooperação Nipo-Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento Agrícola dos Cerrados. https://www.jica.go.jp/brazil/portuguese/office/publications/c8h0vm000001w9k8-att/prodecer.pdf

Land Report. (2026). Bill Gates (Land Report 100 profile). https://landreport.com/land-report-100/bill-gates

Land Report. (2026). The Land Report 100. https://landreport.com/land-report-100

Macquarie Asset Management. (2026). Agriculture. Macquarie Group. https://www.macquarie.com/us/en/about/company/macquarie-asset-management/capabilities/agriculture.html

MapBiomas. (2025, October 1). Um em cada quatro municípios do Cerrado tem menos de 20% de vegetação nativa (Collection 10). https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/en/?p=7715

NovaCana. (2026, October 8). SLC Agrícola projeta alta de 2,2% na área plantada na safra 2026/27. https://www.novacana.com/noticias/slc-agricola-projeta-alta-de-2-2-na-area-plantada-na-safra-2026-27

NPR / Associated Press. (2023, December 16). A cardinal is convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to 5 1/2 years in Vatican trial. https://www.npr.org/2023/12/16/1219839096/cardinal-vatican-embezzlement-trial-guilty

Nuveen. (2026). Natural capital map. https://www.nuveen.com/global/investment-capabilities/real-assets/natural-capital-map

Nuveen. (2026). Global farmland capabilities. https://www.nuveen.com/en-us/about-us/investment-specialists/farmland

Nuveen. (2026). Nuveen Natural Capital. https://www.nuveen.com/en-us/about-us/investment-specialists/natural-capital

Pritchard, B., Welch, E., Umana Restrepo, G., & Mitchell, L. (2023). How do financialised agri-corporate investors acquire farmland? Analysing land investment in an Australian agricultural region, 2004–2019. Journal of Economic Geography, 23(5), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbad008

Reuters via Cyprus Mail. (2021, July 24). Vatican reveals property holdings in transparency drive. https://cyprus-mail.com/2021/07/24/vatican-reveals-property-holdings-in-transparency-drive

Reuters via Global Banking & Finance Review. (2026, June 25). Britain’s Crown Estate profits fall to £1.2 billion. https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/britains-crown-estate-profits-fall-1-2-billion-offshore-wind/

Ricardo, D. (1821). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (3rd ed.; first published 1817). John Murray. Library of Economics and Liberty. https://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html

Scottish Parliament. (2019). Scottish Crown Estate Act 2019. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2019/1/introduction

Shrubsole, G. (2019). Who Owns England? How We Lost Our Green and Pleasant Land and How to Take It Back. William Collins. Summarised in: The Guardian. (2019, April 17). Half of England is owned by less than 1% of the population. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2019/apr/17/who-owns-england-thousand-secret-landowners-author

SLC Agrícola. (2026). Investor Relations. https://ri.slcagricola.com.br/en/

The Crown Estate. (2024, July 25). The Crown Estate to partner with Great British Energy. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/news/the-crown-estate-to-partner-with-great-british-energy

The Crown Estate. (2025, March 12). New powers granted to modernise The Crown Estate for benefit of the UK. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/news/New-powers-granted-to-modernise-The-Crown-Estate-for-benefit-of-the-UK

The Crown Estate. (2026, June 26). The Crown Estate Integrated Annual Report and Accounts 2025 to 2026. HM Treasury. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-crown-estate-annual-report-and-accounts-2025-to-2026–2

The Crown Estate. About us. https://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/about-us

The Crown Estate. The Windsor Estate. https://thecrownestate.co.uk/our-business/the-windsor-estate

UK Parliament. (2004). Energy Act 2004, section 84. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/section/84

UK Parliament. (2025). Crown Estate Act 2025 (c. 7). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/7/contents

US Census Bureau. State area measurements and internal point coordinates. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/2010/geo/state-area.html

Vatican News. (2021, July 24). Challenges in time of pandemic: APSA publishes its balance sheet. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2021-07/challenges-in-time-of-pandemic-apsa-publishes-its-balance-sheet.html

Vatican News. (2022, July). Holy See sells building in 60 Sloane Avenue in London. https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2022-07/holy-see-sells-building-in-60-sloane-avenue-in-london.html

Vatican News. (2026, March 17). Processo vaticano, decretata “nullità relativa” del primo grado. Si riapre dibattimento. https://www.vaticannews.va/it/vaticano/news/2026-03/processo-fondi-santa-sede-ordinanza-corte-appello-17-marzo-2026.html

Westminster Brief. (2025, November 21). Written answer on land ownership (Matthew Pennycook MP). https://westminsterbrief.co.uk/archive/pq/90956